A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Evaluating Service Quality in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Ibrahim M. Hezam

Abstract

The quality of the services provided strongly impacts the university's reputation, enrollment, and student happiness. This paper offers a thorough technique that integrates political, economic, social, technical, and environmental issues to assess the quality of university services. This study proposes a decision-making model for evaluating service quality in higher education. Various criteria are related to this evaluation, so the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology deals with these criteria. The preference ranking organization (PROMETHEE) method is used as an MCDM methodology to rank the alternatives. The criteria weights are computed based on the average method. The results show the environment is of the utmost importance. The sensitivity analysis checks the rank of alternatives. There are 12 cases proposed for criteria weights. The comparative analysis is made using other MCDM methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, EDAS, and MABAC. The results show the rank is stable in different cases, and the proposed method is effective compared with other MCDM methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hezam, I. M. (2023). A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Evaluating Service Quality in Higher Education. Multicriteria Algorithms With Applications, 1, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.mawa.2023.16361
Section
Original Article

How to Cite

Hezam, I. M. (2023). A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Evaluating Service Quality in Higher Education. Multicriteria Algorithms With Applications, 1, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.mawa.2023.16361

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.