Neutrosophic Insights into Military Interventions: Assessing Legitimacy and Consequences in International Law

Abstract

This scientific paper analyzes the legitimacy of military interventions within the framework of international law and their potential consequences. It highlights the need to support these interventions with robust legal and moral reasoning due to their complexity and controversy in the international community. The interpretation of legal and ethical principles can be subjective and lead to disagreements among states and international actors. The consequences of military interventions are explored, ranging from loss of life and infrastructure destruction to population displacement, political instability, and humanitarian crises. Legality and proportionality in interventions are essential to ensuring their legitimacy, and the potential consequences must be carefully assessed before undertaking an intervention. Adherence to the international legal framework is crucial to prevent military interventions from being deemed violations of international law. The neutrosophic DEMATEL methodology used in the study identifies cause-and-effect relationships among key criteria related to military actions in the realm of international law. The article highlights the importance of carefully considering the legitimacy and potential consequences of military interventions within the context of international law.